|
Junior Member
|
引用:
|
作者pc
其實不太需要擔心美國郵政系統，該擔心的是特地上門跟住戶要選票，宣稱會幫選民『護送』這些郵寄選票的『專員』，他們的『身份』令人可疑，把選票交給他們絕對不可靠，所謂的ballot harvesting這個詞可不是亂編造的，那些『內部流程』伎倆早就被人公開了，民主黨還在那邊高唱郵寄選票的好處。
|
沒誤解的話，這兩州都有限制所謂的 ballot harvesting
Wiki 裏還有其它州的說明我就沒細讀了。
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballot_collection
引用:
Arizona
Arizona banned the practice in 2016 except for family members and caregivers. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit stayed the ban in 2016, with Chief Judge Sidney R. Thomas describing the practice as "one of the most popular and effective methods by which minority voters cast their ballots". The United States Supreme Court then stayed the Ninth Circuit ruling that overturned the ban,[5] and a U.S. District Court judge upheld the ban in 2018.[6] In 2020, the Ninth Circuit found that the law violated the Voting Rights Act.[7] The subsequent challenge to Arizona's law was the centerpiece of the 2021 Supreme Court case Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee, which questions if the law violates Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. The Supreme Court ruled in a 6–3 decision in July 2021 that neither of Arizona's election policies violated the VRA nor had a racially discriminatory purpose.
Georgia
In 2019 Georgia passed HB 316, which among other items prohibits any other person other than the elector, a relative (spouse, child, parent, grandparent, grandchild, brother, sister, aunt, uncle, niece, nephew, and in-laws) or an individual residing in the same household from returning the ballot. Exceptions are enumerated for disabled electors, those confined to the hospital, and those imprisoned or detained.[13][14] In 2021, the Election Integrity Act (Senate Bill 202) eased the requirements necessary for successful prosecution of ballot harvesters.
|
|