引用:
|
作者smoguli
我原本預估最好的結果會是 賽普勒斯 模式 , 而且看普丁的發言原本可能已經談得差不多 , 這也可以解釋為什麼盟軍收復雙子城後攻勢放緩 , 無奈被從中破壞.
[我今天想首次公開談論的是，在特別軍事行動開始後，包括在伊斯坦堡開啓和談後，基輔代表對我們的建議作出了非常積極的回應，這些建議首先涉及俄羅斯的安全，我們的利益。但很明顯，和平解決方案西方並不買賬，所以在達成某些妥協後，基輔實際上被直接下令撕毀所有協議。]
|
If a Divided Germany Could Enter NATO, Why Not Ukraine?
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/26/...to-germany.html
Still, if the war does not in the end produce large-scale Russian withdrawal and defeat, what could prove convincing to Mr. Zelensky and Ukrainians — giving any peace talks the most leverage — would be NATO membership, behind solidified cease-fire lines, perhaps patrolled, Mr. Heisbourg suggests, by a coalition of peacekeeping forces from NATO and other countries, like India or even China.