![]() |
||
Elite Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 加入日期: May 2002 您的住址: 板橋
文章: 5,104
|
引用:
燒王船了 ![]() ![]()
__________________
士大夫之無恥,是謂國恥 ![]() ![]() |
||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
Elite Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 加入日期: Aug 2003
文章: 10,478
|
引用:
難民居留權,就瑞典給最大方,之前就被中東裔搞到 這次也是有些往那邊跑賭會不會給永居 有些國家可能居留權不會開很久,戰爭打完可能就把人送回去 |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
*停權中*
加入日期: Feb 2018
文章: 33
|
現階段美國控臺灣的確控很大,而且控的很細膩。
要感同身受的應該是,看了 阿富汗 和 烏克蘭 的前車之鑑,臺灣將是排隊等著被美國放掉的地方之一。 引用:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Advance Member
![]() ![]() 加入日期: Apr 2003 您的住址: 長野
文章: 428
|
__________________
中國網路洗地大隊:輿情引導員、監獄通訊員、網絡評論員。 ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Elite Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 加入日期: Aug 2003
文章: 10,478
|
引用:
要指望別人出兵幫你打都太天真,還是靠自己 首先先恢復兵役至少一年,目前看狗官們還是想拖,不趁民氣可用時候改回來 等半年一年後再說,這不就騙肖,到時候烏克打完或是熱度過去最好還會改 此文章於 2022-03-24 06:29 PM 被 cys070 編輯. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Regular Member
![]() ![]() 加入日期: Feb 2013 您的住址: Republic of Chunghwa (ROC)
文章: 84
|
引用:
1.沒真正見識同伴死在旁邊,不會知道戰爭慘忍的一面,套句中文的說法「不見棺柴不流淚」小屁孩知道害怕 ![]() 2.前蘇聯原本所擁有,你應該先翻翻當年蘇聯體制與怎麼來的,簡單的比喻,美國像是朋友組織的團體(州),蘇聯是幫派組織,老大與小弟關係(附屬國),中國是家大業大,拆分幾個單位管理(省)。才會老大不行瞬間各小弟開會,廢掉老大=>蘇聯解體,小弟永遠不會是老大所擁有... ![]()
__________________
小肥羊是提醒自己在台灣不要被無良商人當肥羊宰。 ![]() 騙創投的訣竅不在你的企劃多漂亮,在你能不能騙進第一個大咖投你,只要有一個頂峰大咖投你,其他創投就會無腦搶了。而頂峰大咖真的那麼聰明睿智眼光準確嗎?才怪,他是靠一個成功的投資抵掉二十個看走眼的失敗而已。 ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() 加入日期: Nov 2015
文章: 1,155
|
烏克蘭會輸會贏誰也說不準
不過可以感覺得出來很多人對於戰爭缺乏”現實感” 才會去到現場才想要繞跑 還有覺得沒有暖氣人就會凍死的 以為基輔是在成功嶺上膩 |
![]() |
![]() |
Major Member
![]() 加入日期: May 2021
文章: 217
|
引用:
那小鎮就是昨天烏克蘭、美國、綠吱大肆宣傳烏克蘭絕地大反攻已奪回為於基輔西側馬卡利夫鎮 而實際上那只是俄烏雙方正在那激烈駁火,然後烏軍這邊有人升起烏克蘭國旗要鼓舞士氣就被人誤以為烏軍收復失土 還腦補因此役勝利切斷俄軍控制首都以西地區的企圖,於是就傳騙全世界,尤其是好騙難教的塔綠班信徒們 ![]() 還有那個離基輔市界只有5公里的什麼車臣士兵在大季梅爾卡和俄軍交火影片也是,連CNN都無法核實 https://youtu.be/DL7_jPZZNyU |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() 加入日期: Nov 2015
文章: 1,155
|
June 26, 1997
Dear Mr. President, We, the undersigned, believe that the current U.S.led effort to expand NATO, the focus of the recent Helsinki and Paris Summits, is a policy error of historic proportions. We believe that NATO expansion will decrease allied security and unsettle European stability for the following reasons: In Russia, NATO expansion, which continues to be opposed across the entire political spectrum, will strengthen the nondemocratic opposition, undercut those who favor reform and cooperation with the West, bring the Russians to question the entire post-Cold War settlement, and galvanize resistance in the Duma to the START II and III treaties; In Europe, NATO expansion will draw a new line of division between the "ins" and the "outs," foster instability, and ultimately diminish the sense of security of those countries which are not included; In NATO, expansion, which the Alliance has indicated is open-ended, will inevitably degrade NATO's ability to carry out its primary mission and will involve U.S. security guarantees to countries with serious border and national minority problems, and unevenly developed systems of democratic government; In the U.S., NATO expansion will trigger an extended debate over its indeterminate, but certainly high, cost and will call into question the U.S. commitment to the Alliance, traditionally and rightly regarded as a centerpiece of U.S. foreign policy. Because of these serious objections, and in the absence of any reason for rapid decision, we strongly urge that the NATO expansion process be suspended while alternative actions are pursued. These include: —opening the economic and political doors of the European Union to Central and Eastern Europe; —developing an enhanced Partnership for Peace program; —supporting a cooperative NATO-Russian relationship; and —continuing the arms reduction and transparency process, particularly with respect to nuclear weapons and materials, the major threat to U.S. security, and with respect to conventional military forces in Europe. Russia does not now pose a threat to its western neighbors and the nations of Central and Eastern Europe are not in danger. For this reason, and the others cited above, we believe that NATO expansion is neither necessary nor desirable and that this ill-conceived policy can and should be put on hold. Sincerely, George Bunn Townsend Hoopes Sam Nunn Robert Bowie Gordon Humphrey Herbert S. Okun Bill Bradley Fred Ikle W.K.H. Panofsky David Calleo Bennett Johnston Christian Patte Richard T. Davies Carl Kaysen Richard Pipes Jonathan Dean Spurgeon Keeny Robert E. Pursley Paul Doty James Leonard George Rathjens Susan Eisenhower Edward Luttwak Stanley Resor David M. Evans Michael Mandelbaum John Rhinelander David Fischer Jack F. Matlock Jr. John J. Shanahan Raymond Garthoff C. William Maynes Marshall Shulman Morton H. Halperin Richard McCormack John Steinbruner Owen Harries David McGiffert Stansfield Turner Gary Hart Robert McNamara Richard Viets Arthur Hartman Jack Mendelsohn Paul Warnke Mark Hatfield Philip Merrill James D. Watkins John P. Holdren Paul |
![]() |
![]() |
Golden Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 加入日期: Nov 2008 您的住址: 常被查水表的小房間
文章: 3,005
|
引用:
![]() ![]() 高畫質的.. https://twitter.com/RALee85/status/...XhoMxUc54GM4QwA 看K島討論有人說是SS-21打的。這東西能打中真的是運氣好。 |
|
![]() |
![]() |